Audi Q5 3.2 FSI Quattro Review: The bigger, the better?

Audi Q5 3.2 FSI Quattro Review: The bigger, the better?

We've sampled the Q5 2.0 TFSI and 3.0 TDI, and found both variants to be very promising SUVs (yes, even the diesel TDI version). Now what about the range-topping 3.2 V6 here - will it be able to move sales, or are Singaporean contented with the 2.0 TFSI already?

OneShift Editorial Team
OneShift Editorial Team
23 Jun 2009
What we like:
pros
Its offroad styling package gives it a more butch look
pros
interior remains solidly Audi
pros
refined and melodious V6 lump is its strongest selling point.
What we dislike:
cons
The extra weight leads to less on-road agility
cons
ride seems busy
cons
2.0-litre TFSI has better torque figure
cons
no S-tronic.

With an almost $30k premium over the base 2.0 TFSI model, the V6 certainly sounds like good value - you get a bigger and more powerful engine with two additional cylinders, a Bang & Olufsen high end sound system, a full multi-media system with SD card readers, internal hard disk, iPod connectivity and sat nav, bigger alloy wheels and the S line styling kit (we'd opt for the off-road kit instead, anytime) on top of the standard package.

But the 2.0 TFSI somehow feels like a more complete car, thanks largely to its punchy and willing gearbox and engine packaging - it feels more alive compared to the V6. On top of that, the former is cheaper come road tax and insurance renewal.

So unless you have a penchant for more cylinders, the Q5 of choice should be the base one - but opt for that off-road package!

Credits: Story by Raymond Lai, pictures by Azfar Hashim

New Cars
get quote bg
Sell your car at the highest price in Singapore
  • pros
    Convenient and Hassle-Free
  • pros
    Consumer Protection
  • pros

    Transparent Process
    With No Obligation

Other Articles
Explore moreright arrow
Market Watch: What Cool Cars Can We Buy In Singapore At S$1,000 Depreciation Per Month?
COE Premiums Fall Across Most Categories In Second COE Bidding Exercise of November 2024
MG ZS Trophy 51 kWh Review: Back to Basics